ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To analyze the differences in efficacy of heminephrectomy with robot-assisted laparoscopy (RARN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). 【Methods】 The published references in national and international databases on the comparison of clinical outcomes between heminephrectomy RARN and LRN for kidney neoplasms were searched. References were screened strictly according to PICOS criteria, and data including estimated amount of blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stay and complications were extracted from those that met the requirements. Sensitivity analysis was used to eliminate the included articles one by one to confirm the robustness of the results, and funnel plot and Eggers test were used to explore publication bias. 【Results】 A total of 16 studies involving 2 063 patients (1 097 in RARN group and 966 in LRN group) were included. The RARN group had less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay, but there were no significant differences between the two methods (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in RARN group was lower than that in LRN group (OR: 0.643, 95%CI: 0.467-0.886, P=0.007). 【Conclusion】 Compared with LRN, RARN has better control of complications in the treatment of renal tumor, but the overall effects of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and hospital stay are comparable.
ABSTRACT
The patient, a 56-year old male, was admitted to the hospital for recurrent bladder cancer in November 29, 2021. The patient had previously undergone partial cystectomy, simultaneous radio-chemotherapy to preserve the bladder, and repeated 4 times TURBt. CT suggested T 3 stage bladder cancer in left bladder wall, and causing left hydronephrosis. Under general anesthesia, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and complete intraperitoneal orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstruction were performed. The operation was successful, the postoperative recovery was good, and the patient was discharged 7 days after surgery. Postoperative pathological diagnosis was T 2b, high-grade urothelial carcinoma with left pelvic lymph node metastasis. Three months after operation, the patient had no recurrence, the new bladder function was good, the urine could be completely controlled during the day, and the intestinal and renal functions recovered well. At present, we carried out adjuvant chemotherapy (Gemcitabine+ Cisplatin)to this patient. The technical of radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder with a history of surgery and radiotherapy is high, expensive experience in laparoscopic surgery and elaborate actions of robotic surgery are important prerequisites for completing such surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the clinical application of robot-assisted laparoscopic single-position nephroureterectomy and bladder sleeve resection for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).Methods:The clinicopathological data of 15 UTUC patients admitted to Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from October 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 7 females, with a median age of 58.6 (ranging 52.6-69.6) years, including 8 cases of renal pelvic cancer, 2 cases of upper ureteral cancer, 5 cases of middle and lower ureteral cancer.The tumor located on the left side in 5 cases and right side in 10 cases. All 15 patients underwent robot-assisted one-step transperitoneal nephroureterectomy and bladder sleeve resection by the same surgeon. The patients were placed in a 70° healthy side lying position with a 10° head lower and foot high position. After routinely dissecting the kidneys and controlling the renal hilum, we continued to dissect the ureter down to the orifice of the bladder. The lymph node dissection was performed when dissecting the kidney and ureter. Then the ureter was resected like a sleeve and the bladder was sutured. Observation indicators, such as operation time, blood loss, postoperative drainage tube and urinary catheter placement days, were recorded.Results:All 15 patients were successfully completed the operation in the same position and the same robot berth without conversion. The median operation time was 103 (ranging 82-185) min, and the intraoperative median blood loss was 60 (ranging 30-120) ml. The postoperative median drainage catheter placement time was 3 (ranging 2-5) d, the postoperative median hospital stay was 5 (ranging 4-7) d, and the postoperative urinary catheters were placed for 14 days. Postoperative pathological examinations of 15 patients showed UTUC without positive margins. The median follow-up time was 15 (ranging 10-30) months. All 15 patients survived. One patient was found a recurrence in the bladder after cystoscopy. There was no tumor progression after bladder tumor resection and bladder perfusion chemotherapy, and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was seen in the remaining 14 cases.Conclusions:Robot-assisted single-position transperitoneal nephroureterectomy for UTUC does not need to change patient position and robot berth, which effectively shortens the operation time, and achieves good tumor control effect. The short-term follow-up results were satisfactory.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To assess short-term functional outcomes achieved by robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.@*METHODS@#We retrospectively collected clinical and operative data for female patients who underwent either pure laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (a control group, =20) or robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (a study group, =20) between December 2017 and December 2018. The clinical indicators included age, gestational age, parity, the stage of pelvic organ prolapse. Perioperative data included operative time and total blood loss. Post-operative outcomes included hospital stay, the time of detaining urethral catheterization, and the restart of anal exhaust after surgery. At the same time, complications and quality of life were observed till 6 months after the surgery.@*RESULTS@#There were no definitely differences in the perioperative data between the 2 groups. It is worth mentioning that robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was superior in strict operative time. With a follow-up of 6 months, the study group's anatomic repair rate was 100% (20/20), while the control group was 95% (19/20). Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-short Form 7 (PFIQ-7) were used to evaluate patients' quality of life. There was no significant difference in the scores between the study group and the control group before and 6 months after surgery. Only the data of the PFDI-20 questionnaires at 1 month after operation were statistically significant, and in the control group was larger than that in the study group, showing that robotic surgery can recover faster than laparoscopy, and the quality of life can be improved quickly.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe and reliable technique, faster than laparoscopy in recovery and has a short-term effect.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Robotics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective To compare the operative-postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotassisted partial nephrectomy (LPN and RAPN) for patients with T1 b renal masses.Methods A total of 169 T1 b renal mass patients receiving LPN (n =69) or RAPN (n =100) in our center between October 2009 and October 2017 were retrospectively collected.There were 46 males and 23 females in LPN group,with a mean age of (55.0 ± 11.9) years.The mean tumor size was (5.09 ± 0.76) cm,and mean R.E.N.A.L score was 6.36 ± 1.53.49 procedures (71％) were performed via a retroperitoneal approach in LPN group.There were 59 males and 41 females in RAPN group with a mean age of (52.9 ± 11.7) years.The mean tumor size was(4.95 ±0.66) cm,and mean R.E.N.A.L score was 8.17 ± 1.50.31 procedures (31％)were performed via a retroperitoneal approach in RAPN group.There was statistical significance between two groups in R.E.N.A.L score and surgery approach (P ＜ 0.001).The group covariates were balanced through propensity score matching (PSM) using 1∶ 1 nearest neighbor matching method.After PSM,operating time,estimated blood loss,warm ischemia time,incidence of complications,hospital stay and postoperative follow-up status were compared between LPN(n =36)and RAPN(n =36)group.Results After PSM,patient distributions were closely balanced.In the LPN vs the RAPN group,there were significant different in warm ischemia time [(23.9 ± 7.3) min vs.(20.4 ± 6.7) min,P ＜ 0.05],estimated blood loss [(136.9 ± 80.2) ml vs.(136.9 ± 80.2) ml,P ＜ 0.05],incidence of complications (8.7％ vs.1.0％,P ＜0.05),and hospital stay [(11.5 ±3.8)d vs.(9.8 ± 1.80)d].There was no significant differences resulted regarding operating time [(164.5 ± 64.4) min vs.(169.0 ± 42.5) min,P ＞ 0.05],variation of estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline [(9.97 ± 8.98)％ vs.(9.27 ± 9.19)％,P ＞ 0.05],positive surgical margin rate (1.4％ vs.0,P ＞ 0.05) and rate of recurrence or metastasis (1.4％ vs.1.4％,P ＞ 0.05) between groups.Conclusion Considering operative,functional and oncologic outcomes,both RAPN and LPN performed by an experienced surgeon were acceptable for patients with T1b renal masses.If available,robotic approach may reduce operative trauma and complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the optimal operation mode and operation path in minimally invasive technique for living donor nephrectomy.Methods From September 2013 to August 2015, 68 living donor nephrectomy was retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one patients were performed with robotic-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy(robotic group), twenty-nine patients underwent totally retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy(non hand assisted group),and eight patients were performed with hand assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy(hand assisted group). Operation time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative hemorrhage volume, hospitalization time, complications and preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine value of the recipients between the two groups were compared.Results The operations of three groups were all performed successfully. Intraoperative hemorrhage volume in the three groups were(39±15)ml,(62±37)ml and(53±19)ml, and there were significant differences between these groups(P<0.05). But hospitalization time ,operation time, warm ischemia time and complications occurred rate in the three groups had no significant difference(P>0.05). In robotic group,2 donors occurred with splenic injury during operation and 1 donor was detected with hemorrhage after operation. In non-hand assisted group, 1 donor occurred with urinary tract infection, 1 donor occurred with external iliac vein thrombosis. In hand assisted group 1 donor was detected with wound fat liquefaction after operation. All the donors were followed up for more than 9 months, no hypertension, proteinuria and renal dysfunction complications were detected. The blood creatinine in three groups of recipients after operation of 5th day and 28th day were(118±26)μmol/L, (130±33)μmol/L,(128±41)μmol/L and(114±17)μmol/L,(116±34)μmol/L,(115±29)μmol/L, respectively, and there was no statistical difference(P>0.05).Conclusions Minimally invasive technique for living donor nephrectomy is beneficial to patients' recovery. Surgery doctors should combine personal experience and the hospital's hardware conditions and other factors. The principle is to ensure the donor's safety and to balance the interests of the donor and the recipient, to choose their own most skilled way of surgery.